Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Julie Hirschfeld Davis: Obama Leads In Poll As Voters View Romney As Out Of Touch

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-20/obama-leads-in-poll-as-voters-view-romney-as-out-of-touch.html


By Julie Hirschfeld Davis - Jun 20, 2012 4:00 AM ET


Barack Obama has opened a significant lead over Mitt Romney in a Bloomberg National Poll that reflects the presumed Republican nominee’s weaknesses more than the president’s strengths.



Obama leads Romney 53 percent to 40 percent among likely voters, even as the public gives him low marks on handling the economy and the deficit, and six in 10 say the nation is headed down the wrong track, according to the poll conducted June 15- 18.
The survey shows Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, has yet to repair the damage done to his image during the Republican primary. Thirty-nine percent of Americans view him favorably, about the same as when he announced his presidential candidacy last June, while 48 percent see him unfavorably -- a 17-percentage point jump during a nomination fight dominated by attacks ads. A majority of likely voters, 55 percent, view him as more out of touch with average Americans compared with 36 percent who say the president is more out of touch.
Taken together, the results suggest an unsettled political environment for both Obama and Romney five months from the November election, with voters choosing for now to stick with a president they say is flawed rather than backing a challenger they regard as undefined and disconnected.

Importance of Turnout

“You can see in these data how important turnout will be,” says J. Ann Selzer of Des Moines, Iowa-based Selzer & Co. who directed the poll. “Those most enthusiastic about the election are more supportive of Romney, but Obama’s voters are more locked into their candidate than Romney’s. Building resolve to vote and making the vote stick is job one, and both candidates face obstacles toward getting that done.”
The presidential race is roughly tied among the most enthusiastic voters, 49 percent of whom back Romney compared with 48 percent for Obama. Still, Romney inspires far less enthusiasm even among his supporters than does Obama, with 35 percent of Romney backers saying their support for him is “very strong,” compared with 51 percent of Obama backers who say so.
“I would rather choose to vote for someone else, but there’s no one but Obama,” says John Sunde, a 57-year-old Verizon central office technician from Brentwood, New York, when asked which candidate would get his vote. “He hasn’t fulfilled a lot of his campaign promises, but I would vote for him anyway because Romney would be extremely destructive for this country.”

Could Do Worse

Sunde, an independent, gives Obama low grades for dealing with the economy yet says Romney would do worse. “His perspective is you just let the free market take care of everything, and we’ll go right down the toilet drain, and everything -- all the jobs -- will go straight to Asia,” Sunde says of Romney.
The poll of 1,002 adults has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points for the full sample. Questions asked of the 734 likely voters have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. Its findings are at odds with other recent national surveys that have found the two candidates tied or shown a slight advantage for Obama or Romney.

Poll Details

Thirty-eight percent of those surveyed in Bloomberg’s poll say they consider themselves Democrats or independents who lean that way and 33 percent consider themselves Republicans or independents who lean Republican, a 5-point Democratic advantage. In 2008, the presidential election exit polls showed the Democrats with a 7-point advantage.
The Democratic advantage in the Washington Post’s May poll sample was 10 points, while the one in the New York Times’ April survey was 8 points and the Wall Street Journal’s May poll was 7 points.
In the Bloomberg Poll, 53 percent of those surveyed were women and 67 percent were white, in line with other national polls. Obama fares better among white voters than he does in other surveys, drawing support from 43 percent compared with 50 percent backing Romney.
Beyond Romney’s low favorability ratings, the poll reflects perceived weaknesses for the Republican challenger both in style and substance. Only 31 percent of likely voters say they’d want to sit next to Romney on a long airplane flight, compared with 57 percent who prefer Obama as a seat mate.

Romney Weak Spots

About a third of likely voters rate Romney best at understanding their problems and struggles, and dealing with world leaders, while Obama draws majorities on both. And just 34 percent of respondents prefer Romney to Obama in appearing regularly on their TV and computer screens for the next four years; the president is the pick of 54 percent. Obama’s favorability ratings are the reverse of Romney’s, with 55 percent of Americans viewing the president positively, while 42 percent don’t.
In a bad sign for Obama, a much smaller plurality, 48 percent, of likely voters say he would be best at getting the economy going, while 43 percent say Romney would do better.
Fifty-three percent of Americans approve of the job Obama is doing in the White House -- the first time since March 2011 that he has broken the historic 50 percent threshold for U.S. presidents who have won re-election; 44 percent disapprove of his service.
His performance rating on creating jobs -- 46 percent approve, while 48 percent disapprove -- matches its high mark in July 2010, and has risen 10 points from his low point in September 2011. A plurality of 45 percent of Americans identify jobs and unemployment as the “most important issue” facing the country.

Obama Warning Signs

More troubling for Obama’s re-election bid, just 31 percent say the nation is headed in the right direction compared with 62 percent who say it’s on the wrong track.
On the economy, just 43 percent approve of Obama’s performance, compared with 53 who disapprove. He fares even more poorly on the budget deficit, where 60 percent disapprove of the job he’s doing compared with 32 percent who approve.
“Obama is the lesser of two evils,” says Rosean Smith, 38, an independent voter from Columbus, Ohio, who says Obama faced unrealistic expectations on the economy. “He was basically handed a sick drug baby and expected to make a genius out of it overnight.”
Smith, a graduate student and mother of six who says she has applied for 80 jobs in the last eight months and landed none, says while Obama is “way in over his head” on the economy, she doesn’t trust Romney to do better.

Best Background

The poll also undercuts Romney’s central argument for his candidacy, suggesting that his background as a private-equity executive isn’t seen by voters as his greatest strength. Asked to name the most important qualification on Romney’s resume, a plurality of 41 percent cite his experience as governor of Massachusetts, while 34 percent say it’s his business experience at the Boston-based firm Bain Capital LLC.
Jeff Angleton, a 40-year-old construction business owner in Haxtun, Colorado, who is backing Romney, says he has had to fire 27 of the 52 people who work at his company because of lack of projects. Angleton, an independent, says he is “scared” of what the future holds if Obama stays in office, though not confident that things will get better if Romney takes the White House.
“I think the guy is a little bit out of touch, because he has too much money to understand what a guy like me deals with,” Angleton says of Romney.

Creating Jobs

Likely voters are split over whether Romney’s business experience made him better-prepared to create jobs as president, with 49 percent saying it doesn’t and 45 percent saying it does.
They are also divided on whether it’s a good idea to elect a corporate chief executive officer as president, with 44 saying it is while 40 percent say it’s not.
Asked how they plan to vote for Congress, 48 percent of likely voters say they’d choose a Democrat compared with 41 percent who would back a Republican. The Democratic Party also scores better than its counterpart, with 50 percent of Americans viewing it favorably while 43 percent don’t. The Republican Party’s favorability rating drops 3 percentage points from Bloomberg’s March poll to 41 percent, while its unfavorability stands at 50 percent.
The public also has a much rosier view of the last Democratic president than it does the last Republican. Former President Bill Clinton is viewed favorably by 69 percent and unfavorably by 25 percent, while former President George W. Bush is seen favorably by 44 percent compared with 51 percent who view him negatively.
Donald Trump, who stood beside Romney at a Las Vegas fundraiser last month and says he’s still skeptical about the authenticity of Obama’s U.S. birth certificate, is seen favorably by 33 percent. Fifty-five percent have an unfavorable view of the real estate magnate and reality TV star who flirted with his own presidential run before backing the presumptive Republican nominee.
To contact the reporter on this story: Julie Hirschfeld Davis in Washington at   orJdavis159@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jeanne Cummings atjcummings21@bloomberg.net

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Ari Shapiro: Can May Polls Predict A November Winner?

Audio:  http://www.npr.org/2012/05/26/153702572/can-may-polls-predict-a-november-winner?sc=17&f=7
Transcript: http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=153702572

May 26, 2012
A Quinnipiac University poll out this week found Mitt Romney with a 6-point lead over President Obama in Florida. That would seem to be very good news for the presumptive Republican nominee in what may be the biggest swing state this fall.
Except another poll, done at the same time by Marist College and NBC News, found Romneytrailing Obama in Florida by 4 percentage points.
So, which is correct? And should voters and the campaigns even pay attention to state or national polls so far before the election?
Predicting Tomorrow, Today
Pollsters often ask: "If the election were held today, who would you vote for?" And right there you have a fundamental problem, says Eric Mogilnicki, a Democrat, who was chief of staff to the late Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy.
The election is not being held today.
"There are so many things that are going to happen in the next six months," says Mogilnicki. "There's going to be literally a billion dollars in ads on TV, and those are going to make a difference. Economic conditions are going to make a difference. There could be events overseas that can't be anticipated now. There's going to be debates."
"Both sides are going to be working on a field organization to turn out the vote," says Mogilnicki. "It's way too early to make any assumptions about what the elections are going to be like."
Nonetheless, polls and polling stories are everywhere in the media.
Republican Jack Howard — who has worked for leaders in the House, Senate and the White House — compares it to baseball standings.
"Look at the Washington Nationals, and they're in first place. They've got a great record. But fast-forwarding that all the way to the playoffs and the World Series, you know, is a stretch," says Howard.
Helpful Hints
Still, Howard says that even this far out, polls mean a lot to the campaigns.
"I think there's a lot of value to getting a real-time fix on where you're at, what your weak spots are and what your strengths are so you can kind of calibrate your campaign," says Howard.
For example, polls last month showed President Obama with a wide lead over Romney among women.
The Romney campaign shifted strategy, and this month, polls suggest that Romney has shrunk the gender gap.
Democratic strategist Maria Cardona says you can see the same thing happening right now with Latino voters: Polls show Obama with a wide lead; Romney is trying to shrink it.
"We saw him speak to a Latino business summit," Cardona says of Romney. "He also just accepted a speaking engagement to a group of Latino elected officials in June. So polls this far out let the campaigns understand what the trends are, because two months out, one month out, it's going to be too late to change that trend."
The Momentum Factor
These polls can also have a big impact on fundraising, says Republican strategist Bruce Haynes.
"Donors like to support campaigns that they feel are going somewhere, that have an opportunity to win, that have that critical momentum behind them," says Haynes.
And he says these early polls also can mobilize people who don't give money.
"They generate momentum in terms of energy around the campaigns, how are volunteers looking at the campaign," says Haynes. "Is this a campaign that I want to support, knock on doors for, put a bumper sticker on my car for?"
So while running poorly in polls can kill a candidate, getting too far ahead can hurt, too.
"What both campaigns can claim, which is a good thing for mobilization, is that they are the underdog," says Cardona, who is already seeing this play out in the Romney and Obama camps.
"What they're saying to their base is essentially: 'This is going to be a really tight election. Your vote is going to matter more so now than in any other election in the past,' " says Cardona.
What the polls can't tell you this far out is who's going to win. On the other hand, the candidate who led in the polls in June wound up winning in three of the past four presidential races.

Friday, May 4, 2012

Kim Geiger: Poll: Romney catches Obama in Ohio, Florida but trails in Pa.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-poll-romney-catches-obama-in-ohio-florida-but-trails-in-pa-20120503,0,4481711.story


WASHINGTON -- It’s been more than 50 years since a candidate has won the White House without carrying at least two of the three swing states of Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania, and a new poll shows Mitt Romney neck and neck with President Obama in two of them.
Romney, who trailed Obama 49% to 42% in Florida and 47% to 41% in Ohio in late March, is now statistically tied with the president, 44% to 43% in Florida and 42% to 44% in Ohio, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll of voters in the three states.
Obama, however, has improved on his lead in Pennsylvania, where he beats Romney 47% to 39%, up from the 45%-42% lead he enjoyed in March.
Quinnipiac surveyed 3,467 voters in the three states in interviews on cellphones and land lines from April 25 through May 1. The results of the survey, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points, led Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the university’s polling institute, to conclude that Obama is doing “slightly better” than Romney in the three states.
“What appears to be keeping Romney in the ballgame, at least in Florida and Ohio, is the perception he can better fix the economy,” Brown said.
A majority of voters surveyed – at least 67% in each state – said they economy was in a recession, but at least half said recovery had begun. In Pennsylvania, voters were divided over which candidate would do a better job on the economy. In Florida and Ohio, more voters thought Romney would do a better job.
Asked whether they believe the Supreme Court should overturn Obama’s healthcare law, a signature achievement of his administration, 51% in Ohio and Florida and 46% in Pennsylvania said they thought it should be overturned.
The poll found Obama continuing to perform better than Romney among women. Pennsylvania women in particular are “wild” about Obama, supporting him 52% to Romney’s 35%.
Still, the 8-percentage-point margin Obama enjoys in Pennsylvania is 3 percentage points lower than his winning margin there in the 2008 election.
kim.geiger@latimes.com

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Joshua Miller: Kentucky: Dueling Polls in 6th District

http://atr.rollcall.com/kentucky-dueling-polls-in-6th-district/

By Joshua Miller Posted at 3:12 p.m. on May 1




Updated 4:00 p.m. | Just how competitive is the race in Kentucky’s 6th district, where four-term Rep. Ben Chandler (D) faces a rematch with attorney Andy Barr (R)? That depends on which poll you believe.
Chandler’s campaign released a poll Monday showing him with a 24-point lead in a head-to-head matchup with Chandler, 54 percent to 30 percent.
But a poll from Barr’s pollsters had the Republican trailing Chandler by only 7 points, 49 percent to 42 percent.
What might account for the difference? Chandler’s pollsters, Mark Mellman’s the Mellman Group, surveyed 400 voters representing the “likely 2012 electorate” in late March, while Public Opinion Strategies, Barr’s pollsters, surveyed 400 “likely 2012 voters” in late February.
In the Democratic poll, Obama won a horse-race matchup against presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in the district, 47 percent to 42 percent with 11 percent undecided.
In the Republican poll, Obama’s job approval was 39 percent and his disapproval was 59 percent, with 45 percent strongly disapproving of his job performance.
Robert Blizzard, a vice president at Public Opinion Strategies who conducted the poll for Barr, questioned the results of Mellman’s poll.
“How is it possible that President Obama — who only received 45% in this very district in 2008, in the best Democratic year in a generation — is doing BETTER now?” he asked in an email to Roll Call. “That just doesn’t make sense, especially given that Kentucky voters strongly disapprove of the job the President is doing and the state has one of the highest disapproval ratings of Obama of any nationally.”
“When a pollster shows numbers that defy conventional wisdom, in this case that Obama is beating Mitt Romney in a Kentucky congressional district, it should make you question the findings of the entire survey,” Blizzard wrote.
In an interview, Mellman pushed back. “I don’t want to get into the tit-for-tat because it’s unseemly,” Mellman said. He noted his firm’s success of getting numbers right, even when other pollsters had different figures — in particular Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s 2010 re-election race.
“I think we’re right and they’re wrong,” he said with a chuckle.
Roll Call rates the race as Leans Democratic. Influential Republicans in the state continue to believe that Barr’s best chance at defeating Chandler was 2010 and that he doesn’t have what it takes to win this cycle.
Both polls had a margin of error of 4.9 points.
Read the dueling memos here:
Clarification: An earlier version of this post did not clearly state that 45 percent of those polled in the GOP survey strongly disapproved of the president’s job performance. Obama’s total job disapproval number in the district, according to the POS poll, is 59 percent.

Friday, April 27, 2012

Alex Roarty: Political Insiders Poll

http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/obama-s-chances-immigration-as-an-issue-20120426
Updated:
April 26, 2012 | 3:00 p.m.

On a scale of zero (no chance) to 10 (virtual certainty), how likely is it that President Obama will win reelection?

DEMOCRATS (100 VOTES)
Average: 7.1
Slight chance (1-3): 0%
Moderate chance (4-6):  31%
Strong chance (7-10): 69%
Moderate chance (4-6)
“We will be returning to a 2000 or 2004 Electoral College squeaker election.”
“McCain won 47 percent. If you think Romney won’t win that same number, you’re a fool. I call that a close election.”
“The voters who matter like him, are disappointed in the job he is doing, and have serious doubts about the apparent Republican nominee. On these facts, the nod goes to the devil they know.”
“It’ll be close, but Obama’s strength with nonwhite voters may be enough to eke it out over Romney.”
“As long as the Fed keeps up the slow and steady support, Obama will have a positive-trajectory economy to win on.”
“Romney is such a lousy candidate. Despite a long list of reasons why Obama shouldn’t win, he will.”
Strong chance (7-10)
“Close, yes. But this isn’t the year of the millionaire corporate raider.”
“Economy rebounding, Mitt’s disastrous primary performance, and the head-to-head matchup all work in his favor.”
“Demographics are destiny, and they really favor Obama, who also understands them.”
“By November no one worried about their job will believe Romney is worried about their job, too.”
“Mitt Romney could barely get the Republican base excited. It smells like 1996, but who knows, it might even be 1984.”
“Immigration, the Ryan plan, the ‘Buffett Rule,’ Osama [bin Laden], and GM. Not as close as people think.”

On a scale of zero (no chance) to 10 (virtual certainty), how likely is it that President Obama will win reelection?

REPUBLICANS (99 VOTES)
Average: 5
Slight chance (1-3): 11%
Moderate chance (4-6): 76%
Strong chance (7-10): 13%
Slight chance (1-3)
“Tough to win with an economy that’s softening once more [and] being overseen by a guy who never worked in the private sector.”
“If the election is about his record, the president can’t win. He will try hard to avoid running on his record, and he might succeed.”
Moderate chance (4-6)
“I’m starting to sense another 1980.”
“This election can truly go either way—and could make 2000 look like a landslide.”
“The lessening of the economic headwinds have made this race a virtual toss-up.”
“If it is a referendum on Obama and the economy, Obama loses.”
“The ‘black swan’ (unforeseen major event) will likely come from abroad, melting Obama’s numbers. He is simply out of his depth.”
“[The] election is a referendum on his economic policies. They are not that great.”
“The demographics are on his side. By the fall, we Republicans will be wondering what happened to the Southwest swing states.”
“The Republicans have the potential of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory—have to try to avoid further alienation of women and Hispanics, but economy will continue to be the issue.”
Strong chance (7-10)
“His strategy is to lay the blame for the economic crisis on the Bush administration, offer no solutions for the future, and draw out Republicans on their extreme social agenda—a trap they will fall into with relative ease.”

How do you think the immigration issue will affect your party’s prospects in November?

DEMOCRATS (100 VOTES)
Help a lot: 34%
Help a little: 47%
No effect: 14%
Hurt a little: 5%
Hurt a lot: 0%
Help a lot
“Mitt’s ‘deport-them-all’ primary position will be hard to walk back.”
“Can you say Nevada, Colorado, Florida, New Mexico?”
“If I was a Republican playing the long game, I’d stop trying to throw people out of the country who’ve lived here a long time. The long-run trend is bad for Rs.”
“Put bluntly, Latinos think Republicans hate them.”
“This issue will pay dividends for Democrats for generations to come.”
Help a little
“Would be more except for the increasing evangelism of Hispanic-Americans eligible to vote.”
“Immigration has the potential to inspire turnout on the Democratic side. While the same might be true for Republicans, the turnout would not be coming from a lower-turnout group.”
“Latino voters in some states may be upset at the Republicans’ posturing on immigration during the primary season, but it is not a game-changer. Let’s face it—it’s not like Republicans were planning on winning 40 percent of the Latino vote in any scenario.”
“It would help more if we were actually working to advance the solution more.”
“Will be crushing for Romney when he’s hit with million [dollars] of ads on Hispanic TV relating his love for the Arizona immigration law.”
No effect
“It’s a polarizing issue, and those on both sides have their minds made up. They’re not persuadable, and it’s unlikely anything will happen on it anyway.”
Hurt a little
“We should have done more on the issue.”

How do you think the immigration issue will affect your party’s prospects in November?

REPUBLICANS (100 VOTES)
Help a lot: 1%
Help a little: 8%
No effect: 30%
Hurt a little: 54%
Hurt a lot: 7%
Help a lot
“It rallies our base and reminds voters that Obama has promised—but done nothing—for three years.”
No effect
“It’s the economy, still, stupid.”
“This issue cuts sharply ... both ways.”
“The immigration opportunity sailed long ago for Republicans. Bad economy has slowed the flow. Zero impact.”
“Did it help John McCain any to be strongly pro-immigration?”
Hurt a little
“Romney should have been the Republican to defend the American Dream, but he pandered to the fringeinstead. Very disappointing, and now he’ll pay a price.”
“2012 may be the last national election that Republicans can win without having addressed broad immigration reform successfully. Has to get done.”
“Our saving grace is that the economy is far more important than immigration, even with Hispanic voters.”
“Republicans are on the wrong side of history on immigration, but the Romney team has time to fix the problem.”
“Romney needs a ‘compassionate conservative’ answer on this.  Otherwise, Obama’s scare tactics will hurt him badly with Hispanics.”
“A little now, a lot in 20 years and forever after that.”
“We will find out.… If we lose Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, the answer changes to a lot.”
Hurt a lot
“Republicans have chosen to be hostile to the idea of the melting pot. Historically, nationalistic zealotry has always had a backlash in presidential elections.”
______________
Democratic Political Insiders Jill Alper, John Anzalone, Brad Bannon, Dave Beattie, Andy Bechhoefer, Cornell Belcher, Matt Bennett, Mitchell W. Berger, Mike Berman, Stephanie Bosh, Paul Brathwaite, Donna Brazile, Mark Brewer, Ed Bruley, George Bruno, Bonnie Campbell, Bill Carrick, Guy Cecil, Martin J. Chavez, Tony Coelho, Larry Cohen, Jerry Crawford, Brendan Daly, Jeff Danielson, Peter Daou, Howard Dean, Scott DeFife, Jim Demers, Tad Devine, David Di Martino, Debbie Dingell, Monica Dixon, Patrick Dorton, Pat Dujakovich, Anita Dunn, Jeff Eller, Steve Elmendorf, Carter Eskew, Vic Fazio, Peter Fenn, Scott Ferson, Jim Fleischmann, Tina Flournoy, Don Foley, Jeffrey Forbes, Vincent Frillici, Gina Glantz, Niles Godes, John Michael Gonzalez, Joe Grandmaison, Anna Greenberg, Stan Greenberg, Pat Griffin, Larry Grisolano, Michael Gronstal, Lisa Grove, Marcia Hale, Jill Hanauer, Dick Harpootlian, Paul Harstad, Laura Hartigan, Doug Hattaway, Mike Henry, Karen Hicks, Leo Hindery Jr., Harold Ickes, Marcus Jadotte, John Jameson, Steve Jarding, Jonathon Jones, Jim Jordan, Gale Kaufman, Lisa Kountoupes, Celinda Lake, David Lang, Penny Lee, Chris Lehane, Jeff Link, Bob Maloney, Jim Manley, Steve Marchand, Jim Margolis, Paul Maslin, Keith Mason, Susan McCue, Gerald McEntee, Steve McMahon, Tom McMahon, Phil McNamara, David Medina, Michael Meehan, Mark Mellman, John Merrigan, Michael Monroe, Steve Murphy, Janet Napolitano, David Nassar, Marcia Nichols, John Norris, Tom Ochs, Tom O’Donnell, Jeffrey Peck, Debora Pignatelli, Tony Podesta, Jefrey Pollock, Jack Quinn, Larry Rasky, Mame Reiley, Ed Rendell, Steve Ricchetti, Will Robinson, Steve Rosenthal, David Rudd, Ryan Rudominer, John Ryan, Michael Sargeant, Stephanie Schriock, Terry Shumaker, Sean Sinclair, Phil Singer, Erik Smith, Doug Sosnik, Greg Speed, Darry Sragow, Ken Strasma, Doug Thornell, Jeffrey Trammell, Ed Turlington, Rick Wiener, James Williams, JoDee Winterhof, Brian Wolff, Jon Youngdahl, and Jim Zogby.
GOP Political Insiders Dan Allen, Stan Anderson, Gary Andres, Saulius (Saul) Anuzis, Rich Ashooh, Whit Ayres, Brett Bader, Mitch Bainwol, Brian Baker, Gary Bauer, David Beckwith, Paul Bennecke, Clark Benson, Wayne Berman, Brian Bieron, Charlie Black, Kirk Blalock, Carmine Boal, Jeff Boeyink, Ron Bonjean, Jeff Buley, Luke Byars, Nick Calio, Al Cardenas, Danny Carroll, Alex Castellanos, Ron Christie, Jim Cicconi, Jonathan Collegio, Rob Collins, Cesar Conda, Jake Corman, Scott Cottington, Jay Cranford, Greg Crist, Diane Crookham-Johnson, Fergus Cullen, Tom Davis, Mike Dennehy, Ken Duberstein, Debi Durham, Sara Fagen, Frank Fahrenkopf, John Feehery, Don Fierce, Mindy Finn, Carl Forti, Alex Gage, Bruce A. Gates, Sam Geduldig, Adam Geller, Benjamin Ginsberg, David Girard-diCarlo, Bill Greener, Jonathan Grella, Lanny Griffith, Janet Mullins Grissom, Doug Gross, Todd Harris, Steve Hart, Christopher Healy, Ralph Hellmann, Chris Henick, Terry Holt, David Iannelli, Ed Ingle, Jim Innocenzi, Clark Judge, David Keating, David Kensinger, Bob Kjellander, Ed Kutler, Chris LaCivita, Jim Lake, Steven Law, Steve Lombardo, Kevin Madden, Joel Maiola, Gary Maloney, David Marin, Mary Matalin, Dan Mattoon, Brian McCormack, Mark McKinnon, Kyle McSlarrow, Ken Mehlman, Jim Merrill, Lisa Camooso Miller, Tim Morrison, Mike Murphy, Phil Musser, Ron Nehring, Terry Nelson, Neil Newhouse, David Norcross, Ziad Ojakli, Jack Oliver, Todd Olsen, Kevin O’Neill, Connie Partoyan, Billy Piper, Van B. Poole, Tom Rath, Scott Reed, David Rehr, Tom Reynolds, Steve Roberts, Jason Roe, David Roederer, Dan Schnur, Russ Schriefer, Rich Schwarm, Brent Seaborn, Rick Shelby, Andrew Shore, Kevin Shuvalov, Don Sipple, Ken Spain, Fred Steeper, Bob Stevenson, Terry Sullivan, David Tamasi, Eric Tanenblatt, Richard Temple, Heath Thompson, Jay Timmons, Warren Tompkins, Ted Van Der Meid, Dirk van Dongen, Jan van Lohuizen, Stewart Verdery, Dick Wadhams, John Weaver, Lezlee Westine, Dave Winston, Ginny Wolfe, Fred Wszolek, and Matthew Zablud.
This article appeared in the Saturday, April 28, 2012 edition of National Journal.